Cindy Crawford

Senior Policy Counsel

Cynthia Fleming Crawford is senior policy counsel with Americans for Prosperity Foundation, focusing on regulatory issues, freedom of expression, and educational freedom. Prior to joining AFPF, Ms. Crawford was senior litigation counsel with Cause of Action Institute, where she focused her practice on defending clients against government overreach, with an emphasis on constitutionally protected individual rights.

Previously Ms. Crawford was in private practice with Nixon Peabody LLP and LeClairRyan where her practice focused on complex business litigation.

Ms. Crawford received her JD from the Georgetown University Law Center, an MA in American Government from Georgetown University, an MBA from the Johnson School of Management at Cornell University, and a BA in Applied Mathematics from the University of California, Berkeley. She is admitted to practice in Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia.

Projects

Emergency Powers
Reform Project
Gone in an Instant
Closed for Business
Right on Transparency

Featured Publications

Have you heard of these cases before the Supreme Court? Here’s why they should matter to you

Censorship by stealth: Can government officials censor speech by pressuring third parties to do it for them?

303 Creative LLC v Elenis: The Biggest Supreme Court Free Speech Case You Might Not Have Heard About

Tiwari v. Friedlander asks: Is depriving patients of medical services rational?

303 Creative LLC v. Elenis asks whether artists can be compelled to speak

Kennedy v. Bremerton School District shows why a high school football coach’s prayer may be important for academic freedom

Can calling an artist a “monopoly of one” displace the First Amendment?

New AFP Foundation brief seeks to close legal loophole banning religious schools from tuition assistance

Cheerleading, social media, and free speech: What the Supreme Court’s decision in Mahanoy School District v. B.L. means for students’ First Amendment rights

Supreme Court unanimously rules FTC must comply with the law

In Uzuegbunam, the Supreme Court validates nominal damages as a means of protecting constitutional rights

Narrow question in Supreme Court campus speech case has broad First Amendment implications