Bipartisan Policy Center Event on “Legislating After Loper”

The event will discuss how the Loper and other court decisions “pose challenges for Congress in how it legislates and directs regulatory agencies. They also underscore existing concerns over congressional capacity, internal processes, and the legislative branch’s ability to tackle complex policy challenges. Last year, BPC established the Working Group on Congress, Courts, and Administrative Law to…

Read More

New Hickman & Wildermuth Article: Harmonizing Delegation and Deference After Loper Bright

Professors Kristin Hickman and Amy Wildermuth have a new article on Loper’s two buckets: “independent judgment for mere statutory interpretation and reasoned decisionmaking for exercises of delegated policymaking discretion.” Abstract By overturning Chevron, the Supreme Court’s Loper Bright decision clearly changed the way in which courts must approach agency actions interpreting statutes. But Loper Bright stopped well short of declaring…

Read More

Early Returns on Loper and Labor Law

Two cases interpreting the Fair Labor Standards Act in the federal courts in Texas  have applied the Supreme Court’s Loper Bright decision to overturn to two separate Department of Labor regulations. Tipped Employees In the first case, Restaurant Law Center v. U.S. Department of Labor, 120 F.4th 163 (5th Cir. 2024), the Fifth Circuit overruled…

Read More

In a Loper Bright Landscape, North Dakota District Court Rejects CEQ’s Attempt to Issue Binding Legislative Rules

Congress created the Council on Environmental Quality to serve as an advisory body that makes recommendations to the President on what environmental policy should be. But CEQ has long claimed power to issue binding regulations—also known as “legislative rules”—implementing the National Environmental Policy Act. The source of CEQ’s claimed power: not a duly enacted statute…

Read More

Loper Bright and Stare Decisis in the Ninth Circuit: Murillo-Chavez v. Bondi 

When the Supreme Court overruled Chevron last year in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, Chief Justice John Roberts seemed at pains to limit the impact of upending the Chevron methodology to future cases.  He explained that Loper Bright “do[es] not call into question prior cases that relied on the Chevron framework.  The holdings of those…

Read More

Loper & Statutory Stare Decisis: How Narrow? How Broad?

One of the most interesting questions surrounding the implementation of Loper Bright is its impact on the statutory stare decisis of previous decisions that courts made under the Chevron framework. Elliot Setzer has this essay on the topic over at the Yale Notice & Comment blog: When the Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine in Loper Bright Enterprises…

Read More