Judge Bumatay’s Powerful Warning in Lopez v. Bondi on Loper Bright Implementation, Skidmore Deference, and Stare Decisis

This week, in Lopez v. Bondi, the Ninth Circuit denied a petition for rehearing of a panel decision upholding the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) conclusion that petty larceny convictions are “crimes of moral turpitude.” Judge Bumatay authored a dissent. While Lopez is ostensibly an immigration dispute, it may have much broader administrative law implications…

Read More

How vague statutory language enabled the Biden administration’s CHIPS Act overreach, and what Congress must do next

My latest op-ed in the Washington Reporter uses FOIA docs from the CHIPS Act implementation to demonstrate how ambiguous laws empower unelected bureaucrats and undermine democratic accountability: When Congress rejected sweeping child care subsidies in the Inflation Reduction Act, the Biden administration’s Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo reportedly told her staff, “if Congress wasn’t going to do what they…

Read More

Applying Loper Bright to EEOC “Right to Sue” Notices

In Prichard v. Long Island University, a U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York relied on Loper Bright v. Raimondo to invalidate an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) regulation that had allowed the agency to issue “right to sue” notices before 180 days had passed.  The decision made clear that EEOC regulations should…

Read More

Susan Dudley in Forbes: Congress Must Step Up

Following her appearance at the HSGAC hearing on the future of Loper Bright, former OIRA Administrator Susan Dudley had a series of recommendations for how Congress can reassert itself and fulfill its constitutional role. “First, legislation should recognize that while scientific facts are a necessary element of good policy design, they are almost never sufficient.”…

Read More