Posts by James Valvo

Catholic University Law School Professor and Director of the Separation of Powers Institute Chad Squitieri discusses Skidmore v. Swift & Co., including its status after Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, with University of Minnesota Law Professor Kristin Hickman.

Professor John Meisel’s recent post at the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog offers a fascinating framework for understanding how the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo creates an incentive for Congress to avoid “statutory vagueness” and “draft more precise statutes.”  Meisel characterizes the Court’s decision as establishing a “penalty…

Last month, the Center for Progressive Reform (“CPR”) published a report analyzing the reception of Loper Bright in the lower courts.  CPR’s headline empirical finding is that agency “win” rates have dropped from roughly 70% under Chevron to just 57% in the fourteen months following the Loper Bright decision.  Given this shift, you might expect…

In Loper Bright v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court overturned Chevron deference, ending forty years of courts deferring to agency statutory interpretations. Now, the duty of saying what the law is has returned to where it belongs: the courts. Two years later, federal agencies are quickly rewriting the regulatory landscape, reconsidering many old regulatory interpretations that…

In June 2024, a landmark Supreme Court decision — Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo — changed how federal laws are interpreted. While government agencies possess the constitutional authority to create regulations that explain how to implement a statute on a daily basis, they do not have the authority to interpret unclear laws. In the Loper Bright case, a federal…

Santa Fe Institute and Foundation for Economic Education trustee John Chisholm in the Wall Street Journal revisiting Justice Kagan’s worry that ending Chevron deference would “cause a massive shock to the legal system.” What about Justice Kagan’s warning? Two years on, no “massive shock” has materialized. Agencies still prevail in most challenges. Empirical studies put…

Law & Liberty published an essay by AFPF’s James Valvo & Ryan Mulvey on how a recent dustup over the constitutionality of the Presidential Records Act provides an opportunity to strengthen antifragile government. The essay opens: The Presidential Records Act (PRA) has lately been a source of controversy. The Department of Justice’s Office of Legal…

In this final panel from the Gray Center’s October conference, moderator Aaron Nielsen (UT Austin) speaks with Judge Naomi Rao (D.C. Circuit) and Judge Steven Menashi (Second Circuit) about their role as judges after Loper Bright ended Chevron deference.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has rescinded its long-standing Rule 202.5(3) that requires respondents settling allegations with the agency to agree to never “publicly deny the allegations in the complaint or administrative order” or risk having their settled charges reopened.