Loper Bright’s Penalty-Default Rule

Professor John Meisel’s recent post at the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog offers a fascinating framework for understanding how the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo creates an incentive for Congress to avoid “statutory vagueness” and “draft more precise statutes.”  Meisel characterizes the Court’s decision as establishing a “penalty…

Read More

De Novo Review Is Working: A Response to CPR’s Loper Bright Report

Last month, the Center for Progressive Reform (“CPR”) published a report analyzing the reception of Loper Bright in the lower courts.  CPR’s headline empirical finding is that agency “win” rates have dropped from roughly 70% under Chevron to just 57% in the fourteen months following the Loper Bright decision.  Given this shift, you might expect…

Read More

AFPF Launches Reg Reform Tracker, Tracing Impact of Loper Bright and Trump EOs

In Loper Bright v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court overturned Chevron deference, ending forty years of courts deferring to agency statutory interpretations. Now, the duty of saying what the law is has returned to where it belongs: the courts. Two years later, federal agencies are quickly rewriting the regulatory landscape, reconsidering many old regulatory interpretations that…

Read More

Stand Together profiles how New Jersey Fishermen Helped reshape Government Power

In June 2024, a landmark Supreme Court decision — Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo — changed how federal laws are interpreted. While government agencies possess the constitutional authority to create regulations that explain how to implement a statute on a daily basis, they do not have the authority to interpret unclear laws. In the Loper Bright case, a federal…

Read More

John Chisholm Recounts Loper Bright After Two Years

Santa Fe Institute and Foundation for Economic Education trustee John Chisholm in the Wall Street Journal revisiting Justice Kagan’s worry that ending Chevron deference would “cause a massive shock to the legal system.” What about Justice Kagan’s warning? Two years on, no “massive shock” has materialized. Agencies still prevail in most challenges. Empirical studies put…

Read More

A Healthy Constitutional Squabble

Law & Liberty published an essay by AFPF’s James Valvo & Ryan Mulvey on how a recent dustup over the constitutionality of the Presidential Records Act provides an opportunity to strengthen antifragile government. The essay opens: The Presidential Records Act (PRA) has lately been a source of controversy. The Department of Justice’s Office of Legal…

Read More

Walter Olson on Why The Freedom to Give Helps Protect Everyone’s Liberty

Writing on the Cato Institute’s At Liberty blog, Olson summarizes a recent panel discussion: Joining us were two major figures in contemporary American philanthropy: Lawson Bader, president and CEO at DonorsTrust, which helps right-of-center benefactors create donor-advised funds (DAFs), and John Palfrey, president of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, known for supporting…

Read More

9-0 Supreme Court Again Recognizes Disclosure Harms the Freedom of Association

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in First Choice Women’s Resource Centers v. Davenport recognizing the harm to First Choice Women’s Resource Centers and its donors from an investigatory subpoena issued by the New Jersey Attorney General. Ensuring nonprofits are protected against such demands from state AGs was a core part of why…

Read More