newsroom

All Resources
  • All Resources
  • Amicus Brief Commentary
  • Blog
  • Civil Liberties newsletter
  • Commentary
  • Energy
  • Featured
  • Foreign Policy
  • Free Speech
  • Freedom of Association
  • Health Care
  • Immigration
  • In the News
  • Investigations
  • Loper Bright
  • Newsroom
  • Op-ed
  • Podcast
  • Press Release
  • Success Stories
  • Victory
  • Video
Siren Retail Corporation: Another Nail in the Coffin of NLRB Deference 

Earlier this summer, I highlighted the D.C. Circuit’s decision in Hospital Menonita and its rejection of deference to the National Labor Relations Board.  Last week, in Siren Retail Corporation v. NLRB, the Second Circuit joined the ranks of the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Tenth, and D.C. Circuits by emphasizing the judiciary’s obligation, after Loper Bright, to…

Read More about Siren Retail Corporation: Another Nail in the Coffin of NLRB Deference 
Yanez Piedra and Statutory Stare Decisis After Loper Bright 

One of the more doctrinally vexing passages in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo is the Supreme Court’s admonition that, notwithstanding the significant doctrinal change caused by the overruling of Chevron, “holdings of those cases” previously decided under that interpretive framework would “still [be] subject to statutory stare decisis.”  As Chief Justice Roberts explained, “[m]ere reliance…

Read More about Yanez Piedra and Statutory Stare Decisis After Loper Bright 
Podcast: Skidmore After Loper Bright

Catholic University Law School Professor and Director of the Separation of Powers Institute Chad Squitieri discusses Skidmore v. Swift & Co., including its status after Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, with University of Minnesota Law Professor Kristin Hickman.

Read More about Podcast: Skidmore After Loper Bright
AFPF Marks Two Years of Loper Bright with Sen. Schmitt & Expert Panelists

Last month, Americans for Prosperity Foundation (“AFPF”) hosted a special summit marking the two-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s momentous decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo.  The event was well attended, and registrants spent a half-day listening to experts explore how Loper Bright is driving the Trump Administration’s regulatory agenda and giving Congress the opportunity to reassert its Article I authority and rethink its relationship with the administrative state.  While most public debate about Loper Bright understandably has focused on developments…

Read More about AFPF Marks Two Years of Loper Bright with Sen. Schmitt & Expert Panelists
The Hospital Menonita Dissent Demonstrates Why Loper Bright Must be Constitutionalized 

By John J. Vecchione  Ryan Mulvey has ably discussed the implications of the history and holding of Hospital Menonita de Guayanma v. NLRB in these pages.  To sum up, the NLRB had a successor-bar rule requiring that an employer deal with a union for a year after taking over the company based on an irrebuttable…

Read More about The Hospital Menonita Dissent Demonstrates Why Loper Bright Must be Constitutionalized 
Environmental Defense Fund v. EPA: Does Loper Bright Impact the Chenery Doctrine? 

In Environmental Defense Fund v. EPA, the D.C. Circuit recently flagged an interesting impact Loper Bright might have on administrative law. Judge Henderson’s opinion suggests the possibility that, after Loper Bright, the Chenery doctrine—which holds that “reviewing courts ‘must judge the propriety of [agency] action solely by the grounds invoked by the agency’”—may not apply to “pure statutory interpretation questions.” This question matters because in challenges to agency decisions like federal regulations and adjudications, to the extent the Chenery doctrine applies it…

Read More about Environmental Defense Fund v. EPA: Does Loper Bright Impact the Chenery Doctrine? 
Lenity After Loper Bright: Deference and Liberty in Criminal Law 

Earlier this spring, in Rutherford v. United States, the Supreme Court held the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1) was inconsistent with the underlying statutory text, and that nonretroactive changes in sentencing law could not qualify as “extraordinary and compelling reasons” to justify early release.  That decision, and its explanation of the principles that limit the Commission’s delegated authority, accentuates how Loper Bright v. Raimondo now binds every agency—including the Commission.   In her opinion for the majority, Justice Barrett…

Read More about Lenity After Loper Bright: Deference and Liberty in Criminal Law 
Hospital Menonita and the Future of NLRB Deference 

In the wake of Loper Bright and the end of Chevron deference, commentators have wondered whether the Supreme Court’s definitive interpretation of Section 706 could spell the end of other deference doctrines, including those that have developed outside the context of the APA.  One conspicuous body of caselaw under suspicion involves deference to the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) and its interpretations of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”).  The D.C. Circuit’s decision last week in Hospital Menonita de…

Read More about Hospital Menonita and the Future of NLRB Deference 
Loper Bright’s Penalty-Default Rule

Professor John Meisel’s recent post at the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog offers a fascinating framework for understanding how the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo creates an incentive for Congress to avoid “statutory vagueness” and “draft more precise statutes.”  Meisel characterizes the Court’s decision as establishing a “penalty…

Read More about Loper Bright’s Penalty-Default Rule