Amicus Brief Commentary
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District shows why a high school football coach’s prayer may be important for academic freedom
Government employs a veritable army of teachers, professors, graduate students, undergraduate work-study students, as well as coaches, teachers’ aides, tutors, and administrators. To what degree can government, as an employer, punish the people it hires for their own personal expression? That’s a live question. The First Amendment protects citizens from the government. The government doesn’t…
Read MoreDon’t Be Fooled: West Virginia v. EPA Is About Who Decides Important Policy Questions Under the Constitution
An opportunity to restore judicial review of constitutional claims against agencies
Chevron Deference Meets Madison’s ‘Very Definition of Tyranny’
Can calling an artist a “monopoly of one” displace the First Amendment?
Public accommodations laws “help ensure a free and open economy.” Traditionally, public accommodations laws have been applied to, well, public accommodations, such as hotels, or “what the old common law promised to any member of the public wanting a meal at the inn, that accepting the usual terms of service, they will not be turned…
Read MoreStop Letting Judges Punish Defendants for Acquittals
New AFP Foundation brief seeks to close legal loophole banning religious schools from tuition assistance
Should a child’s opportunity for education turn on the religious perspective of the child? Should it turn on the religious perspective of the school? What if the school is just a little bit religious? Or too religious? Would that matter? It would if the child lives in an area of Maine with no public school.…
Read MoreAxon Enterprise v. FTC gives Supreme Court a chance to protect separation of powers
Cheerleading, social media, and free speech: What the Supreme Court’s decision in Mahanoy School District v. B.L. means for students’ First Amendment rights
One of the biggest student free speech cases in the last half century started with a high school cheerleader and a profanity-laced Snapchat. The implications of that terse, ephemeral message extend well beyond the original hundred-plus friends with whom the freshman student shared her post. In a decision today, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 8-1…
Read MoreSupreme Court unanimously rules FTC must comply with the law
Today, the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in an opinion delivered by Justice Breyer that the Federal Trade Commission must comply with the law and end its ultra vires pursuit of money damages. The opinion presents a straightforward statutory interpretation of the scope of FTC enforcement power under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, which allows…
Read More