Brookings Institution Commentary Considers Loper Impact on New Administration

The Brookings Institution published a commentary piece from Frank J. Thompson, Distinguished Professor of Public Affairs Emeritus & Faculty Director at Rutgers University, arguing that “[t]he Supreme Court’s overturning of the Chevron doctrine may unintentionally weaken Trump’s ability to govern unilaterally by empowering lower courts—often selected through strategic forum shopping by his opponents—to more freely block…

Read More

Loper Bright and the Unlawful Regulation Executive Order

TechFreedom’s Corbin Barthold on the FedSoc Blog explores whether the Trump Administration has “Good Cause” to skip notice and comment in response to the Administration’s executive order directing agencies to repeal “unlawful, unnecessary, and onerous regulations:” New precedents often raise as many questions as they answer. Take the first case on the executive order’s list: Loper Bright…

Read More

Cass Sunstein calls Loper Bright “Our Marbury”

Cass Sunstein’s latest piece on Loper Bright was published in the Duke Law Journal: Our Marbury: Loper Bright and the Administrative State. Here’s the abstract: Loper Bright, overruling Chevron, is unmistakably part of administrative law’s current “Grand Narrative,” which sees contemporary administrative agencies with suspicion, as a product of successive breaches of Article I, II,…

Read More

Loper’s Impact on the Tax Bill

Michael Rapoport at Bloomberg Tax has a piece on how “Congressional tax writers are taking steps to head off any future legal challenges to their new tax bill, but it’s a delicate balancing act.” The bill’s directives for Treasury to act are “more deliberative and detailed” than usual, and that added specificity “may be aimed…

Read More

Loper Bright Leads Argument in Washington D.C. Court of Appeals Case

Yesterday, Loper Bright took center stage in an oral argument before the District of Columbia Court of Appeals: A three-judge panel of Washington, D.C.’s high court at oral arguments Wednesday investigated how the US Supreme Court’s new agency deference standard applies to courts in the district as part of a dispute over a $5.9 million…

Read More

Post-Loper Debate on Section 230 and the FCC

Lawrence J. Spiwak, President of the Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies, writes on the FedSoc Blog that the “FCC still can’t interpret Section 230:” Which brings me to proponents of the FCC’s power to interpret Section 230. About a month after I wrote my original post, Seth Cooper of the…

Read More

Bloomberg Law Podcast Series on Loper Airs Second Episode

Bloomberg Law’s UnCommon Law podcast continues its series on the “story behind the fishing industry’s Chevron doctrine challenge:” This season on UnCommon Law, we’re exploring the limits of agency power. To what extent are federal agencies authorized to create and implement regulations that aren’t explicitly mandated by Congress? And what happens when an agency goes too far?…

Read More

VA Omaha Leaders Rig Consult System to Deny Veterans Access to Community Care 

The VA’s manipulation of wait-time data isn’t just a scandal—it’s a betrayal of veterans’ right to timely care. A recent investigation by the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General (OIG) confirms what veterans, whistleblowers, and Americans for Prosperity Foundation’s previous investigations have been sounding the alarm on for years: VA leaders are deliberately…

Read More

New Paper on Restoring Separation of Powers After Loper

Joseph A. D’Angelo from the Florida International University College of Law published “Chevron Solutions: Restoring the Separation of Powers in a Post-Chevron Landscape” in the University of Florida’s Journal of Law and Public Policy: The erosion of congressional authority in the face of expanding executive power, particularly through administrative agencies, is of critical importance. A…

Read More

Does Brand X Survive Loper Bright For Express Delegations? 

In U.S. v. Bricker, the Sixth Circuit grappled with whether the Sentencing Commission could use a policy statement to expand the scope of the federal compassionate release statute, which authorizes early release for “extraordinary and compelling reasons,” to cover nonretroactive changes in sentencing law, when the en banc Sixth Circuit previously reached the opposite conclusion.…

Read More