New Article on Loper Bright, Interpretive Rules, and Sub-regulatory Guidance 

The University of New Hampshire Law Review recently published an article by University of Tulsa law professor Gwendolyn Savitz entitled “Interpretive Rules are the New Regulations: Agency Guidance After Loper Bright.”  The article explores the impact Loper Bright might have on agencies turning to interpretive rules to bypass notice-and-comment rulemaking and, potentially, searching judicial review…

Read More

D.C. Circuit Accepts FERC Regulatory Interpretation Previously Upheld under Chevron Step-Two 

In a long-awaited remand decision, the D.C. Circuit in Solar Energy Industries Ass’n v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission upheld FERC’s regulatory interpretation of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (“PURPA”).  The Circuit previously sided with FERC last year when it concluded the agency’s position was “reasonable” under Chevron Step Two, in light of supposed statutory…

Read More

How vague statutory language enabled the Biden administration’s CHIPS Act overreach, and what Congress must do next

My latest op-ed in the Washington Reporter uses FOIA docs from the CHIPS Act implementation to demonstrate how ambiguous laws empower unelected bureaucrats and undermine democratic accountability: When Congress rejected sweeping child care subsidies in the Inflation Reduction Act, the Biden administration’s Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo reportedly told her staff, “if Congress wasn’t going to do what they…

Read More