Posts by kschmidt
VA Omaha Leaders Rig Consult System to Deny Veterans Access to Community Care
The VA’s manipulation of wait-time data isn’t just a scandal—it’s a betrayal of veterans’ right to timely care. A recent investigation by the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General (OIG) confirms what veterans, whistleblowers, and Americans for Prosperity Foundation’s previous investigations have been sounding the alarm on for years: VA leaders are deliberately…
Read MoreNew Paper on Restoring Separation of Powers After Loper
Joseph A. D’Angelo from the Florida International University College of Law published “Chevron Solutions: Restoring the Separation of Powers in a Post-Chevron Landscape” in the University of Florida’s Journal of Law and Public Policy: The erosion of congressional authority in the face of expanding executive power, particularly through administrative agencies, is of critical importance. A…
Read MoreDoes Brand X Survive Loper Bright For Express Delegations?
In U.S. v. Bricker, the Sixth Circuit grappled with whether the Sentencing Commission could use a policy statement to expand the scope of the federal compassionate release statute, which authorizes early release for “extraordinary and compelling reasons,” to cover nonretroactive changes in sentencing law, when the en banc Sixth Circuit previously reached the opposite conclusion.…
Read MoreFederal Court Rules the Biden Administration Illegally Cancelled ANWR Lease Sales
In a late March decision, the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska ruled that the Department of the Interior (DOI) acted unlawfully when it canceled oil and gas leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) held by the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority (AIDEA). The court emphasized that, under the Tax…
Read MoreLoper’s Impact on Notice and Comment Rulemaking
Cary Coglianese & Daniel E. Walters write in the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog: With the ink barely dry in Loper Bright, we are beginning to see just how unsettled, and how unpredictable, the administrative governance game can be in a post-Loper Bright world. With a new memorandum, “Directing the Repeal of Unlawful Regulations,”…
Read MoreRyan Mulvey on Sunshine Week, Loper Bright, and FOIA
AFP Foundation’s Ryan Mulvey published an article in the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog on how “Loper Bright will impact FOIA jurisprudence, specifically with respect to judicial review of agency use of Exemption 3.” “Chevron is overruled.” With these historic words, Loper Bright eliminated Chevron deference. The resolution of all legal questions—including the meaning of withholding statutes used…
Read MoreNew Paper on Litigating After Loper
Liberty University School of Law’s Eric Bolinder published a new paper on “Litigating After Loper.” Bolinder previously represented the fishermen in Loper while at Cause of Action Institute and argued the case before the D.C. Circuit. Abstract This article arrives at a critical juncture in Administrative Law and comprehensively answers two burning questions about Loper…
Read MorePacific Legal Foundation Writers Assess the Impact of VanDerStock
Pacific Legal Foundation’s Will Yeatman and Charles Yates write in Notice & Comment about how Bondi v. VanDerStok “has the potential to dent the arc of administrative law. As Justice Alito observed in his dissent, the case could end up being ‘a huge boon for the administrative state.’” Following Loper Bright, the Justice Department started probing…
Read MoreTexas District Court Applies Loper Bright To Reject FDA’s Unlawful Expansion of Its Regulatory Jurisdiction
Yesterday, in American Clinical Laboratory Ass’n v. FDA, a Texas district court properly relied on Loper Bright to reject the FDA’s attempted ultra vires expansion of its jurisdiction under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) to regulate, for the first time, laboratory testing services as manufactured “devices.” Ever since City of Arlington, court deference to…
Read MoreLoper Bright Cited in D.C. Circuit’s Decision in Alien Enemies Act Case
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has denied the federal government’s emergency request to stay a pair of temporary restraining orders in J.G.G. v. Trump, a high-profile case challenging the Trump Administration’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 (“AEA”). Somewhat unexpectedly, the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v.…
Read More