Year
Issue Area
Court
2025
The Buckeye Institute v. Internal Revenue Service
Question Presented
1. Whether exacting scrutiny governs a First Amendment challenge to 26 U.S.C. § 6033(b)(5)’s requirement that nonprofit organizations disclose their “substantial contributors.
2025
Canna Provisions Inc. et al. v. Bondi
Question Presented
(1) Should the Court overrule Raich’s holding that Congress can regulate purely local economic activity if there is any “rational basis” that such activity substantially affects interstate commerce? (2) Has Congress validly prohibited the purely local growing, distribution, and possession of state-regulated marijuana under the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause?
2025
National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo
Question Presented
When it is obvious that a government official’s conduct violates the Constitution under longstanding Supreme Court precedent, is the violation clearly established for purposes of qualified immunity despite some factual distinctions that are irrelevant under the governing constitutional rule?
2025
Gun Owners of America, Inc. v. ATF
Question Presented
Does a federal court enjoy equitable authority under the Freedom of Information Act to order the return or destruction of records released by an agency, even when such disclosure is allegedly inadvertent, and can it also prohibit further use or dissemination of such records by their recipient.
2025
In re Liam M.
Question Presented
Does a family court order, which authorizes Child Services to enter and search an innocent mother’s home and supervise her parenting, violate the mother’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches?
2025
Leck v. Wyoming Education Association
Question Presented
Does the Wyoming ESA Program violate the Wyoming Constitution?
*The Wyoming Supreme Court denied leave to file this brief.
2025
Trump et al. v. Slaughter et al.
Question Presented
Whether the statutory removal protections for members of the Federal Trade Commission violate the separation of powers and, if so, whether Humphrey’s Executor v. United States should be overruled.
2025
First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Platkin
Question Presented
Whether, when the subject of a state investigatory demand has established a reasonably objective chill of its First Amendment rights, a federal court in a first-filed action is deprived of jurisdiction because those rights must be adjudicated in state court.
2025
Villarreal v. Alaniz
Question Presented
(1) Whether it obviously violates the First Amendment to arrest someone for asking government officials questions and publishing the information they volunteer; and (2) whether qualified immunity is unavailable to public officials who use a state statute in a way that obviously violates the First Amendment, or instead shields those officials.
2025
Case v. Montana
Question Presented
Whether law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant based on less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring, or whether the emergency-aid exception requires probable cause.
2025
Lucid Group USA v. State of Georgia
Question Presented
Whether a Georgia law that prohibits EV manufacturers (with one exception) from selling cars directly to consumers violates the Georgia Constitution’s Due Process, Equal Protection, and Uniformity Clauses because the law is arbitrary and irrational and fails to advance any legitimate state interest in regulating.
2025
Ream v. U.S. Department of Treasury
Question Presented
Whether a federal ban on at-home distilling of spirits—even for personal use—exceeds constitutional limits on the federal government’s powers.
Amicus Commentary
- All
Supreme Court should protect citizens’ rights to freely access U.S. waters
When Jim and Cliff Courtney sought to offer private boat transportation so customers could conveniently access their businesses — including Stehekin Valley Ranch, with cabins and a lodge house in the Lake Chelan National Recreation Area — the state of Washington denied their right to do so unless the Courtneys could prove the existing ferry…

SCOTUS has chance to clarify the muddy waters of takings jurisprudence in Cedar Point v. Hassid
From before the founding, the “fundamental maxims of a free government [have] seem[ed] to require, that the rights of personal liberty and private property should be held sacred.” The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment exists to protect those sacred rights from unfettered state appropriation by requiring: first, that any taking of private property be…