Loper Bright
HSGAC Hearing: The Future is Loper Bright: Congress’s Role in the Regulatory Landscape
Senator James Lankford chaired a hearing in the Subcommittee on Border Management, Federal Workforce and Regulatory Affairs on Loper Bright and Congress. Witnesses include Susan Dudley, Chad Squitieri, and Allyson Schwartz.
Read MoreTrump Administration Using AI to Speed Up Deregulatory Effort After Loper Bright
The first several months of the Trump Administration have focused on executive orders, agency reorganization, and budget reconciliation. But attention is now shifting to the meat of Executive Branch reform: deregulation. The Washington Post reports that DOGE has built a deregulatory tool that harnesses AI to assist agencies in identifying and eliminating unnecessary or unlawful…
Read MoreLoper Bright’s Impact on Education Law
The Brookings Institution hosted an essay by two professors, Raquel Muñiz and Rebecca Natow, profiling Loper Bright‘s impact on education law. They write: Since the case was decided in 2024, Loper has been cited by courts as justification to restrain executive agency actions relating to education. In Tennessee v. Cardona (2025), a federal district court in Kentucky…
Read MoreJustice Department in Talks to Settle Loper Bright
NRO’s Dan McLaughlin on the recent DOJ filing asking the D.C. Circuit to hold Loper Bright in abeyance on remand while the parties pursue settlement: The Loper Bright and Relentless plaintiffs could still have a long voyage ahead in the appeals courts — unless the government listens to reason. But it seems that attention to the anomalous position taken…
Read MoreSeventh Circuit Declines to Apply Loper Bright to Modify Standard of Appellate Review on Fact Issues in FOIA Cases
The Seventh Circuit has rejected an argument that Loper Bright impacts its standard of appellate review under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). In Brodsky v. FBI—a case involving a confidential informant’s access to records about himself—the Seventh Circuit affirmed the lower court’s ruling that the FBI properly withheld material under Exemptions 3, 6, and…
Read MoreNo Signs of a Skidmore Revival at the Supreme Court
Earlier this week at SCOTUSblog, Columbia University law professor Abbe Gluck suggested the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management might reflect what some have forecast as a “revival” of so-called “Skidmore deference.” On her reading of Kennedy, the Court’s examination of “considered and consistent Executive Branch practice—which beg[ins] contemporaneously with enactment of…
Read MoreRhode Island Judge Rules Against Fishermen in Companion Case to Loper Bright
A federal judge in the District of Rhode Island ruled in favor of the government yesterday in Relentless v. Department of Commerce, the companion case to Loper Bright v. Raimondo, which was sent back to lower courts on remand after the Supreme Court’s historic decision last year. With the end of Chevron, the district court…
Read MoreSCOTUSblog Term Review on Deference
At SCOTUSblog, Abbe R. Gluck writes about Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, and ” the broader question of how the court will grapple with questions of expertise in the wake of its 2024 decision overruling Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, the key agency-deference case of the modern era.” Finally, for good measure, the opinion concludes with a…
Read MoreBloomberg Law on Appeals Courts and Loper
Bloomberg Law’s Robert Iafolla writes about how “circuit courts have started going in different directions on the level of deference judges should grant agencies.” Federal appeals courts are still figuring out how much weight to give to agencies’ views of their legal authority, a year after the US Supreme Court said judges must interpret relevant…
Read MoreNew Paper Argues for “Gray Doctrine” of Implicit Delegation
Harvard Law School’s Matthew Stephenson recently published “The Gray Area: Finding Implicit Delegation to Agencies After Loper Bright.” From the abstract: This Article argues that the canonical pre-Chevron cases Gray v. Powell and NLRB v. Hearst Publications, together with their antecedents and progeny, provide a useful framework for distinguishing those interpretive questions on which courts ought to find implicit…
Read More