Amicus Briefs

Question Presented

Question Presented

Whether a federal ban on at-home distilling of spirits—even for personal use—exceeds constitutional limits on the federal government’s powers.

Question Presented

Whether the Corporate Transparency Act exceeds constitutional limits on the federal government’s powers.

Question Presented

What legal standard is applicable to a student’s untargeted ideological speech that promotes a viewpoint different from the school’s preferred viewpoint.

Question Presented

Whether Arizona’s Prop 211, which requires multi-layer donor disclosure for issue advocacy, violates the First Amendment.

Question Presented

Whether the Court should overrule the frisk holding of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), which allows police officers to search people absent probable cause to arrest.

Question Presented

1. Does the for-cause restriction on the President’s authority to remove the CPSC’s Commissioners violate the separation of powers? 2. Should Humphrey’s Executor v. United States be overruled? 3. For purposes of preliminary-injunctive relief, can a separation-of-powers violation cause irreparable harm or can separation-of-powers violations never cause irreparable harm?

Question Presented

Whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority.

Question Presented

Whether a plaintiff may be awarded attorney fees as a prevailing party under Section 1988 when a government defendant changes its policy and moots the case before adjudication on the merits.

Question Presented

Whether elementary school students possess First Amendment speech rights in public schools, and if so, to what extent.

Question Presented

Whether the Arizona state legislature has standing to challenge the donor disclosure law known as Proposition 211.

Question Presented

Whether the for-cause restriction on the President’s authority to remove Commissioners of the Consumer Product Safety Commission violates the separation of powers.