Year
Issue Area
Court
2024
McNutt v. U.S. Department of Justice
Question Presented
Whether a federal ban on at-home distilling of spirits—even for personal use—exceeds constitutional limits on the federal government’s powers.
2024
Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland
Question Presented
Whether the Corporate Transparency Act exceeds constitutional limits on the federal government’s powers.
2024
L.M. v. MiddleBorough
Question Presented
What legal standard is applicable to a student’s untargeted ideological speech that promotes a viewpoint different from the school’s preferred viewpoint.
2024
TOMA, et al. v. FONTES et al.
Question Presented
Whether Arizona’s Prop 211, which requires multi-layer donor disclosure for issue advocacy, violates the First Amendment.
2024
Cooper v. U.S.
Question Presented
Whether the Court should overrule the frisk holding of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), which allows police officers to search people absent probable cause to arrest.
2024
Leachco Inc. v. CPSC
Question Presented
1. Does the for-cause restriction on the President’s authority to remove the CPSC’s Commissioners violate the separation of powers? 2. Should Humphrey’s Executor v. United States be overruled? 3. For purposes of preliminary-injunctive relief, can a separation-of-powers violation cause irreparable harm or can separation-of-powers violations never cause irreparable harm?
2024
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al. v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al.
Question Presented
Whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority.
2024
Lackey v. Stinnie
Question Presented
Whether a plaintiff may be awarded attorney fees as a prevailing party under Section 1988 when a government defendant changes its policy and moots the case before adjudication on the merits.
2024
BB v. Capistrano Unified School District
Question Presented
Whether elementary school students possess First Amendment speech rights in public schools, and if so, to what extent.
2024
Toma, et al. v. Fontes, et al.
Question Presented
Whether the Arizona state legislature has standing to challenge the donor disclosure law known as Proposition 211.
2024
Consumers’ Research et al. v. CPSC
Question Presented
Whether the for-cause restriction on the President’s authority to remove Commissioners of the Consumer Product Safety Commission violates the separation of powers.
Amicus Commentary
- All
AFP Foundation Leads Coalition Brief Urging Sixth Circuit to Protect Public Access and Rein in Abuses of Copyright Law
ARLINGTON, VA – Today, a coalition of organizations led by Americans for Prosperity Foundation (AFP Foundation) filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Stovall v. Jefferson County Board of Education, a pivotal case concerning government transparency and the misuse of copyright law to block access to public…
AFPF Files Amicus Brief Applauding President Trump’s Effort to Spur The End of The De Facto Fourth Branch of Government
The separation of powers is badly distorted. Today, there are many administrative bodies within the Executive Branch that Congress has tried to shield from presidential control, and in doing so, set up a veritable Fourth Branch of government. President Trump recently has taken several actions to assert his proper control over these extraconstitutional administrative bodies. …
New York Appellate Court Strikes Down A State Practice Allowing Intrusive Surveillance Of Innocent Families
In a significant win for the liberty interests of parents in the care and custody of their children, yesterday a New York appellate court vacated and held unlawful a longstanding state practice that subjected parents who were never accused of any wrongdoing to ongoing supervision by local child services officers. That supervision allowed state authorities…
NetChoice and the “Informational Interest”: Can the Government Ensure You Listen to the Right Message?
The Supreme Court’s decision in NetChoice v. Moody, the much-anticipated challenge to Texas’s regulation of social media companies, was not the barnburner many had anticipated. Instead of deciding the First Amendment question directly, the Court found that neither lower court did the proper facial analysis, meaning they must not only find a First Amendment violation…
Americans for Prosperity Foundation releases summary of engagement for Supreme Court October 2023 term
Arlington, VA – Americans for Prosperity Foundation today released a report of its amicus engagement during the October 2023 Supreme Court term. AFPF Chief Policy Counsel James Valvo said: This term the Supreme Court upheld protections for free expression, ruling the government cannot coerce companies to stop doing business with organizations based on their speech. The…
Congress, not bureaucrats, should make federal criminal law
By Michael Pepson Would it surprise you to know that Congress has granted the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) unfettered power to write its own criminal code governing one-tenth of the land in the United States? A Nevada federal court ruled that Congress unconstitutionally transferred its legislative power to write crimes to the BLM. Last…
Ryan Mulvey on WBNA TV 21 Kentucky’s Voice Discussing the Misuse of Copyright Law to Block Records Requests
AFP Foundation’s Ryan Mulvey appeared on WBNA’s Kentucky’s Voice to discuss AFP Foundation’s coalition brief urging Sixth Circuit to protect public access and rein in abuses of copyright law.