Amicus Briefs

Question Presented

Whether the State compelling a cake designer to knowingly design, make, and provide a cake to celebrate a transgender transition, even when the creator behind the work vehemently
disagrees with the underlying premise and purpose for which he knows that the cake is being made, violates his First Amendment rights.

Question Presented

Whether the First Amendment prohibits viewpoint-, content-, or speaker-based laws restricting select websites from engaging in editorial choices about whether, and how, to publish and disseminate speech — or otherwise burdening those editorial choices through onerous operational and disclosure requirements.

Question Presented

(1) Whether 47 U.S.C. § 254 violates the nondelegation doctrine by imposing no limit on the FCC’s power to raise revenue for the Universal Service Fund. (2) Whether the FCC violated the private nondelegation doctrine by transferring its revenue raising power to a private company run by industry interest groups.

Question Presented

Does a plaintiff’s APA claim “first accrue[]” under 28 U.S.C. §2401(a) when an agency issues a rule—regardless of whether that rule injures the plaintiff on that date—or when the rule first causes a plaintiff to “suffer[] legal wrong” or be “adversely affected or aggrieved”?

Question Presented

Whether the IRS violated the Fourth Amendment by seizing Mr. Harper’s private financial information from a third-party virtual currency exchange without a showing of probable cause that a crime, or any other wrongdoing, had been or was likely to be committed.

Question Presented

(1) Whether the judge-made “clearly established law” qualified immunity standard, which lacks textual, historical, and logical support, and which does not advance its purported policy objectives, should be abolished or limited; and (2) whether respondents are entitled to qualified immunity on Felkner’s First Amendment claims when they had ample time to reflect and seek legal counsel prior to engaging in a sustained course of conduct that abridged Petitioner’s clearly established First Amendment right to freedom of speech?

Question Presented

1. Whether statutory provisions that empower the SEC to initiate and adjudicate administrative enforcement proceedings seeking civil penalties violate the Seventh Amendment. 2. Whether statutory provisions that authorize the SEC to choose to enforce the securities laws through an agency adjudication instead of filing a district court action violate the nondelegation doctrine. 3. Whether Congress violated Article II by granting for-cause removal protection to administrative law judges in agencies whose heads enjoy for-cause removal protection.

Question Presented

Question Presented

Whether university bias-response teams — official entities that solicit, track, and investigate reports of bias; ask to meet with perpetrators; and threaten to refer students for formal discipline — objectively chill students’ speech in violation of the First Amendment.

Question Presented

1. Whether the state may deny equal protection of the laws and exclude people from a trade for the sole purpose of easing its regulatory burden, or whether restrictions on the right to enter a common and lawful occupation require more scrutiny. 2. Whether the Supreme Court should overrule the and hold that the right to enter a common and lawful occupation is a privilege or immunity protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Question Presented

Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the statute providing funding to the CFPB, 12 U.S.C. 5497, violates the Appropriations Clause, U.S. Const. Art. I,§ 9, Cl. 7, and in vacating a regulation promulgated at a time when the CFPB was receiving such funding.

Question Presented

Whether the FTC’s administrative prosecution violated the U.S. Constitution, including Article I, Article II, Article III, and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and whether the FTC’s Order is therefore void ab initio.